Proposal for a Technology to Crowdsource the Slush Pile

In the (not-so) good ol’ days, literary agents and acquisition editors acted as gatekeepers, shutting a plethora of bad manuscripts out of the publishing process and letting only a chosen few of the best reach the reader. Although the system was not perfect – an awful lot of good manuscripts never made it though the gate and some pretty trite stuff did – readers could be assured that any book they bought would meet a minimal standard of professional production.

Now, when anybody can self-publish anything without restriction, some wonderful books are lost in a sea of unedited, badly-formatted, thoughtless crap.

Buying and reading a book is an investment of a bit of your money and a lot of your time. You are only allotted a finite number of hours in your life, so it’s not a decision that you should take lightly.

What are you, avid reader, to do?

One clue – bestseller lists – gives you a place to start, but it has problems. It tells you how many people bought a book, but not how many people read it. Authors give ebooks away for a while to try to capture an audience. But if the book is free, many people download it and never get around to reading it before they delete it from their ereader to make more space.

There is an obvious solution to this shortcoming.

EBook readers could be modified so that they automatically collect and disclose the most important information about a book – how much of the book people actually read.

It would be a free service that you subscribe to. In exchange for letting your ereader send reports about your progress through the book that you are reading, you would be able to see graphs of how far other people read through other books.

When you want to buy a new book, you would look for graphs in which the number of people reading the last page is as high as the number of people reading the first page. You would avoid books that many people may have started, but no one ever finished.

It would be both necessary and easy to make the service completely anonymous. Nobody would know which books you have read. Your ereader would send only the book’s identifier and a page count. It would never send your name or any information about you.

Not only would readers find this useful information, but writers would benefit as much or more because they could see where their book was losing readers.

This would be implemented first as an app on tablets because they are easily programmable. Once its utility was clear, the same functionality would be built into dedicated readers like the Kindle and Nook.

I’m too busy writing novels to do this myself so, if anyone else wants to give it a shot, feel free.

Yours, Ashley


About Ashley Zacharias

I'm a post-modern woman who lives a vanilla life and dreams about kinky adventure. I write BDSM pornography but have no interest in acting out my fantasies in real life. Find my work on and
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Proposal for a Technology to Crowdsource the Slush Pile

  1. John says:

    Hi Ashley

    Assuming your purpose here was to stimulate thought, consider yourself successful. By-the-way, I’m a long time fan of your stories and am currently waiting for the 5th book of Irene’s life as a slave.

    I’ve been reading, with interest, your “musings”. For the most part I find I agree with your points, least on first reading. In all cases, it’s refreshing to have a clearly written idea to think about. This one is intriguing as far as it goes but would require significant oversight to make it work.

    Any unsigned digital data is easy to manipulate by simply automating the “reading” process and saturating the internet in favour of any document you wish. The source of the data can be hidden simply by routing it though random servers etc.

    Having pointed out a problem, here is a possible partial solution, Generate a unique key with the download for each book and store the key on your database. The first submission with the valid key would be counted, any other would be ignored as would mismatched or mis-dated keys. Since a purchaser could technically be traced by their book purchase, a trusted administrator and a separation of purchaser data from key data would be required.

    In any case, thanks for giving me an interesting evening of reading and problem solving.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s